Many Persons with Hemianopic Vision Loss Can Safely Drive a Car

It's always unfortunate when you have to add insult to injury by revoking the driver's license of a person who has just lost part of their vision due to a stroke, brain tumor, or other intracranial disease.

It is not at all uncommon to have these people tell you that although they realize they have lost part of their vision, they they are safe, careful drivers and they should be allowed to continue to drive.

It has always been my belief that although these people may think they are still capable of driving, they have, in fact, lost the left or right half of their vision in each eye (known as a hemianopia) and are probably a danger to themselves and others if they were to get behind the wheel of a car.

Then comes along a research paper (in the February edition of Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science) that confirms what the patient has claimed all along - that they can safely drive a car.

The researchers took 30 patients with hemianopsias (22 complete, 8 partial) and 30 normal-sighted persons for a 14 mile test drive through city and highway traffic. The vehicle was student driver equipted (extra brake) and the person riding shotgun was a certified driving rehabilitation specialist. Two "back-seat" evaluators who didn't know if the driver was normally sighted of had a hemianopic vision defect independently graded driving performance using a standard scoring system.

Using this test system, 73% (16/22) of drivers with a complete hemianopic defect and 88% (7/8) of drivers with a partial hemianopic defect received safe ratings from the back-seat graders.

The researchers concluded that some drivers with hemianopia are fit to drive. These results call into question the fairness of governmental policies that categorically deny licensure to persons with hemianopia without the opportunity for on-road evaluation.

Scientific Atlanta Explorer 2200 Settop Box

I recently rebuilt my PVR, which contains a Hauppauge PVR-150 with remote. In order for the Hauppauge remote to control my Scientific Atlanta Explorer 2200 settop box (STB), I have to connect a infra-red (IR) emitter from the Hauppauge to the STB, placing the emitter directly over the infrared sensor of the STB. Unfortunately, it was not at all clear where the sensor was located, and the information I could locate on the web was sparse and largely inaccurate.

The IR sensor can be located by shining a bright flashlight through the smoked plastic window containing the LED clock. You will see several circuit board components located on either side of the clock -- look for one that appears to be an "electric eye", round with a lens in the center of it. Place the emitter directly over it and test. If it does not work, place it over a different component and try again until you find the correct component.

SATA Drive Disappears

I recently purchased a Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 ST31500341AS 1.5TB for a PVR I was rebuilding (hopefully I will get around to blogging about this project). There are many reported problems with this drive, but since it is the only 1.5TB HDD currently on the market, and the price is so low, I figured it was worth a shot. I was wrong.

First, there are known firmware issues with this drive. There is also a high reported failure rate. So when I encountered problems with this drive, it was unclear where the fault lay.

The problem I experienced is, apparently, fairly common with SATA drives. After a period of time the hard drive simply disappears from Windows. It cannot be found in either Windows Explorer or Computer Management. It will, however, reappear after a reboot. For me, the HDD consistently disappeared while attempting to copy files onto it.

Reported solutions to this problem include defective cables and power issues. Others mention driver, BIOS, and firmware trouble. Still other "computer voodoo" solutions include switching SATA ports. However, nobody mentioned what may be a more common cause: the HDD is dying.

After spending nearly a week chasing down Seagate Tech Support to obtain a firmware update for my drive, they informed me that the firmware on my drive (CC1H) was the most current (at least for my OS - Windows XP).

After exhausting every other possible solution (including switching SATA ports), I was about ready to RMA the drive when, on a whim, I decided to load up SeaTools, the Seagate Diagnostic software. It immediately informed me that S.M.A.R.T. had been triggered on the drive in question. When I requested the "Long Test" be performed, it essentially informed me that the HDD was already known to be defective, and did I really want to subject it to the Long Test - I conceded.

So, the lesson learned from this experience is that whenever I encounter HDD issues, one of my first steps should be to download the latest version of the manufacturer's diagnostic software and confirm that the drive is not defective. At least in this case, the bad S.M.A.R.T. status was not reported during boot-up nor in the BIOS. I don't know if this is typical of SATA drives or not, but it seems that if you do not specifically check the S.M.A.R.T. status of a HDD, you cannot be assured that it is okay.